An analysis of U.S. equity valuations following Fed Chair Powell's warning that the market is "fairly highly valued."
Analysis based on statements from September 2025
"By many measures, U.S. equity prices are fairly highly valued."
Powell's remarks function as "jawboning"—a form of verbal intervention to influence market expectations without direct policy action. This echoes Alan Greenspan's famous 1996 "irrational exuberance" warning during the dot-com bubble, signaling official concern over speculative froth.
The Fed faces a difficult "two-sided risk": easing monetary policy too soon could reignite inflation, but keeping it restrictive for too long risks derailing the economy and labor market. Powell's statement subtly communicates that the "Fed Put"—the market's implicit belief that the Fed will always step in to prevent a crash—is not unconditional, especially while inflation remains a concern.
Key metrics unanimously signal a market in a state of historical overvaluation.
Measures price relative to average inflation-adjusted earnings over the previous 10 years, smoothing out business cycle fluctuations.
Strongly Overvalued
~39.9
vs. ~17.3 mean
+131%
Compares the total market capitalization of all U.S. stocks to the nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
Strongly Overvalued
~219%
vs. ~85% mean
+158%
The standard measure of stock price relative to the aggregated earnings per share of companies over the last 12 months.
Overvalued
~25.9 - 30.8
vs. ~19.4 mean
+33% to +59%
Compares the S&P 500's earnings yield (inverse of P/E ratio) to the yield on 10-year Treasury bonds.
Bonds More Attractive
-0.69%
vs. +0.26% mean
Negative Spread
History shows a powerful tendency for valuations to "mean revert." When markets reach extreme peaks, subsequent long-term returns are often flat or negative as valuations compress back toward their historical averages.
| Market Peak | Shiller P/E at Peak | 1-Year Real Return | 5-Year Ann. Real Return | 10-Year Ann. Real Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1929 | 32.6 | -35.2% | -13.9% | -0.5% |
| Dec 1999 | 44.2 | -6.5% | -5.8% | -1.2% |
| Jun 2007 | 27.6 | -40.6% | -3.1% | +2.9% |
| Sep 2025 | ~39.9 | ? | ? | ? |
An actionable playbook for the prudent investor in a challenging landscape.
The cornerstone of a resilient portfolio is a disciplined allocation strategy. For instance, a traditional 60/40 portfolio (60% equities, 40% bonds) serves as a baseline. With 10-Year Treasury yields above 4%, high-quality bonds are once again a viable source of income and diversification. Rebalancing—periodically trimming appreciated assets (like U.S. equities) and reallocating to underperforming ones (like bonds or international stocks)—enforces a 'sell high, buy low' discipline and manages risk.
In an expensive market, seek a 'margin of safety' by investing in companies trading below their intrinsic worth. Look for low P/E ratios, strong free cash flow (the cash a company generates after accounting for capital expenditures), and sustainable dividends. Prioritize 'quality'—companies with strong balance sheets, low debt, and durable competitive advantages ('moats'), which allow them to maintain profitability over the long term.
Increase allocation to sectors that provide essential goods and services. These businesses tend to have more stable earnings, predictable cash flows, and lower volatility, offering a cushion during market downturns. Their inelastic demand makes them less susceptible to economic contraction, providing a defensive tilt to a portfolio.
Consistent demand for food, beverages, and household products regardless of the economic climate.
e.g., Procter & Gamble (PG), Coca-Cola (KO), Walmart (WMT)
Essential services like electricity, water, and gas are non-negotiable for households and businesses.
e.g., NextEra Energy (NEE), General Electric (GE), Duke Energy (DUK)
Demand is largely inelastic, driven by demographics and health needs rather than economic cycles.
e.g., Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Pfizer (PFE), Sanofi (SAN)
The extreme overvaluation is primarily a U.S. phenomenon. Many international developed markets (e.g., in Europe and Japan) and emerging markets are trading at far more attractive valuations. Shifting a portion of an equity allocation abroad can reduce concentration risk from a single, expensive market and may enhance long-term returns if the U.S. market underperforms.
Use dollar-cost averaging (DCA) by investing a fixed amount at regular intervals, regardless of market highs or lows. This strategy removes the dangerous emotion of trying to 'time the market.' It automatically buys more shares when prices are low and fewer when they are high, lowering your average cost basis over time and mitigating the risk of deploying a large lump sum at a market peak.
To maintain a balanced view, it's crucial to consider arguments for why today's high valuations might be justified.
A significant portion of the S&P 500's high valuation is driven by a handful of mega-cap technology stocks with extraordinary earnings growth and dominant market positions. Proponents argue their premium P/E ratios are justified by their fortress-like balance sheets, high profitability, and leadership in secular growth trends like AI. The market, therefore, isn't uniformly expensive; it's top-heavy.
While rates have risen, they remain low by historical standards from before the 2008 financial crisis. In a lower-rate world, future earnings are discounted at a lower rate, making them more valuable today. This structural shift, some argue, supports a permanently higher plateau for equity valuations compared to previous decades.
Unlike the dot-com bubble, where many high-flying stocks had no earnings, today's market leaders are immensely profitable. The composition of the S&P 500 has shifted from capital-intensive industrial firms to asset-light, high-margin technology and service companies. This change in market structure could warrant higher aggregate valuations than in the past.
While compelling arguments exist to justify current valuations, the weight of historical evidence suggests profound risks. The present environment does not call for panic, but for a rational, disciplined shift in strategy. Success in the coming years will likely belong not to those who chase momentum, but to those who build a resilient framework on the enduring principles of diversification, value, quality, and systematic discipline.
Stay informed with our comprehensive market analysis and strategic insights.